Spam spam spam spammity spam
Sometimes, I really can't work out what spammers are after. A list I'm on was vigourously bombarded - about 50 copies got through before an admin got on the case - with a listing of reg codes for Microsoft stuff, up to and including a beta build of Longhorn. I can see why someone might send a single copy, but not 50. And there's no benefit in sight.
And there's a very well written one in this morning to Swiftpay from "Elizabeth Richson", saying that she writes for a website, has linked to us, and would we be interested in linking back to her? Apparently she found us by searching for a given search term, which is one that you'd reasonably find Swiftpay on. If it wasn't for the slightly klunky line of "My site is all about Finance - Misc too", I wouldn't even have glanced at the headers. But it turns out to be from a non-existent domain, and in something mildly mindboggling, googling for that name gives a total of two results, neither connected in any way to finance sites. So a mail asking for a link to a site which doesn't seem to exist, from an email address that can't be replied to, which was generated by a clever program tripped up only by the fact that the category the site is listed under didn't fit as a natural language noun. Why? How can anyone possibly profit by sending this?
And there's a very well written one in this morning to Swiftpay from "Elizabeth Richson", saying that she writes for a website, has linked to us, and would we be interested in linking back to her? Apparently she found us by searching for a given search term, which is one that you'd reasonably find Swiftpay on. If it wasn't for the slightly klunky line of "My site is all about Finance - Misc too", I wouldn't even have glanced at the headers. But it turns out to be from a non-existent domain, and in something mildly mindboggling, googling for that name gives a total of two results, neither connected in any way to finance sites. So a mail asking for a link to a site which doesn't seem to exist, from an email address that can't be replied to, which was generated by a clever program tripped up only by the fact that the category the site is listed under didn't fit as a natural language noun. Why? How can anyone possibly profit by sending this?
no subject
no subject
Jerry suggested something diabolical when I commented that I was receiving spam that didn't function as spam; it'll break Bayesian filters. As people click the "this-is-spam" button, the spam filter will start accepting stuff with no commercial motivation as spam, breaking email even more. (Of course, if I had any sense, I wouldn't propagate this meme any more.)
Within the last week, my old TCD class exchanged seven or eight emails, and two or three of them hit my spam folder. This is _much_ higher than the normal false positive rate for me; I can't imagine how annoying it would be for someone with a well-distributed address who had to deal with non-net-heads on a regular basis :-(
talking about spam ...
Nigerian 419
Re: talking about spam ...
Re: talking about spam ...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2004-01-13 08:25 am (UTC)(link)Elizabeth Richson
(Anonymous) 2004-01-16 11:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: Elizabeth Richson
(Anonymous) - 2004-01-20 18:54 (UTC) - ExpandBusy, busy girl.
I cracked up because my site (a regular personal site with a focus on DIY tutorials and recipes) was noted as being "all about Business - Industrial Supplies, too." That Elizabeth! Such a smart cookie!
I got one two
(Anonymous) 2004-01-16 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)Your Reference to a spam by Elizabeth Richson with no URL and no functional e-mail return address
(Anonymous) 2004-01-17 12:15 am (UTC)(link)I believe an anti-spam software provider deliberately spams people with enormous amounts of garbage before conveniently offering to provide a solution. The solution will not work, of course, but the "anti-spammer" makes a profit. In fact the "anti-spammer" is the actual "spammer."
Just a thought. God Bless. Michael W. Neely, Editor - The AV Hub (http://www.avhub.net)(mwneely@dslextreme.com)
I am also puzzled
(Anonymous) 2004-01-23 11:04 am (UTC)(link)Most pointless spam ever.
- Tiffany
tconroy AT ccna DOT ca
no subject
(Anonymous) 2004-01-31 02:42 am (UTC)(link)The following information may be of interest:
Neotrace information
Domain Name: ELIZABETHRICHSON.COM
Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
Referral URL: http://www.opensrs.org
Name Server: NS1.INTERCOM.COM.CN
Name Server: NS.INTERCOM.COM.CN
Status: ACTIVE
Updated Date: 18-dec-2003
Creation Date: 18-dec-2003
Expiration Date: 18-dec-2004
Whois info for, elizabethrichson.com:
Registrant:
apple
2198 Apple dr.
Columbus, OH 43212
US
Domain name: ELIZABETHRICHSON.COM
Administrative Contact:
Johnson, Muliya billrichson@yahoo.com
2198 Apple dr.
Columbus, OH 43212
US
410-678-8768
Technical Contact:
Customer Service, EV1 Servers domains@ev1servers.net
2600 SW Freeway
Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77098
US
+1.7133337873 Fax: +1.7139429332
Registration Service Provider:
Everyones Internet, domains@ev1servers.net
http://www.ev1servers.net
Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
Record last updated on 18-Dec-2003.
Record expires on 18-Dec-2004.
Record created on 18-Dec-2003.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS.INTERCOM.COM.CN
NS1.INTERCOM.COM.CN
Re:
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-02 10:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Reporting Elizabeth Richson
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-15 19:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Elizabeth Richson
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-18 17:11 (UTC) - ExpandI received the same
(Anonymous) 2004-02-02 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)Amazingly the email was correct in verifying my site has having to do with Java Programming - also Elizabeth Richson also mention that she would like to exchange links with me as her site is about "computers - software" too.
What's the deal with this?
And there were no links on the email - so who ever who sent the email would not know if I opened the email.
And since the email return path was wrong - elizabeth richson would not recieved bounce emails.
Very puzzling
Re: I received the same
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-03 06:00 (UTC) - ExpandPossible motive?
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-04 12:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Possible motive?
(Anonymous) - 2004-02-05 06:48 (UTC) - ExpandInteresting...
Re: Interesting...
Elizabeth Richson
(Anonymous) 2004-02-18 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)Born (http://www.discountshoeguide.com/Born.html)
Has anyone gotten this?
Re: Elizabeth Richson
no subject
Is this the most irrelevant example of this email?! Car accessories...archives...hmmmm! It's common for people not to know what we do, but the spambots have clearly been utterly baffled by this one! I've been falling about laughing all morning...
Re:
(no subject)
Heh.. looks like you're the best resource for ms Richson
(Anonymous) 2004-02-22 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)1. EMails you with an effective social engineering marketing hook. There's no link to her site, and elizabethrichson.com doesn't allow web traffic (when I tried it).. So one would think it was a legit email by a user that just forgot to tell where she linked you at.
2. Richson emails you again later on, wondering why you didn't link her site (automated bot again). This time, however, she gives you a site to link back to...
I see this as doing two things. If there is a unique identifier in the link in the second email, then visiting that link will bump up the link ratio of that person. So score one for them. If you happen to link the site from your site, then google sees it as an "important link" and ups that site's PageRank. Another score for the spammer. If you link the site using a unique identifier, then anyone clicking on the link from your site will up the click ratio of the spammer again.. score 3.
This is something I've not encountered before, but sounds like a damned good marketing social engineering scheme.. But hey, now you know what's up (maybe, I could be entirely wrong since I've only gotten the initial email).
Tech
www.livingearthherbs.com
no subject
(Anonymous) 2004-03-09 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)Are you guys paranoid or am I naiive??? We'll have to wait and see.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth Richson" <elizabeth@elizabethrichson.com>
To: <webmaster@medicalcentre.net.au>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: Re: medicalcentre.net.au ranked # 13 in Google for diabetes gestational ketones
> Hey -- it's Elizabeth. Thanks for the reply.
>
> Like I said before, I'm already linked to you. You can link to me here with this code: Ketones (http://www.lowcarbfoodauthority.com/ketones.html)
>
> I added you into this directory of hand reviewed sites called High Index. I submit things to them as an editor, and got you up as a featured listing in the following category: http://www.highindex.com/Health/Conditions_and_Diseases/Endocrine_Disorders/Pancreas/Diabetes/Nutrition/
>
> You can click on that link if you want to check it out.
>
> Thought you might like that. Anyway, I'll leave you up there for a few days until i hear from you. If i don't hear back, I will have to take the link down. Thanks again. I look forward to swapping links with you soon!
>
>
> Elizabeth
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: webmaster@medicalcentre.net.au
> Sent: 9 Mar 2004 21:57:51 GMT
> To: elizabeth@elizabethrichson.com
> Subject: Re: medicalcentre.net.au ranked # 13 in Google for diabetes gestational ketones
>
> You haven't mentioned your site name or URL
>
> Paul O'Brien
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Elizabeth Richson" <elizabeth@elizabethrichson.com>
> To: <webmaster@medical-centre.com.au>
> Cc: <webmaster@medicalcentre.net.au>; <info@medicalcentre.net.au>
> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 6:17 AM
> Subject: medicalcentre.net.au ranked # 13 in Google for diabetes gestational
> ketones
>
>
> > I'm a web master, and I was just searching Google for diabetes gestational
> ketones. I found your domain, medicalcentre.net.au ranked 13, which is
> pretty cool.
> >
> > My site is all about Health - Weight Loss, too . Maybe we should link up?
> I wouldn't be stealing any of your sales, because all I do is write
> informational articles...not selling anything on my site at all. And most of
> my visitors write back to say that they love the fact that I only write
> good, quality info. As a matter of fact, I've got a pretty loyal following
> of people that come back over and over again (they use the site as a
> reference), so if you link to me, you should get some pretty good traffic
> from it -- which is always nice.
> >
> > Anyway, let me know if you'd like to swap links. I've already linked to
> you, and will keep it up there for a few days until I hear back. Hope to
> hear from you soon!
> >
> > Elizabeth Richson
> > RAC IM: 769482.
> >
>
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2004-03-11 05:10 (UTC) - Expand