An interesting interview between Jeremy Paxman and Tony Blair. No idea who Paxman is, but he asks some good questions, as do members of the audience.
Another thing that just occurred to me... I watched a recording of Colin Powell's statement to the UN Security Council last Wednesday, and saw Jack Straw speaking just after him. I've seen people saying - seen peripherally, that is - that Powell's speech was "powerful" and "moving". Um, folks. The man read it from a sheet of paper in front of him, pausing every three words and looking up. It was like a poor performance in a small debating society. Jack Straw didn't say anything substantially different (in fact, it reminded me of the puppet scene from Chicago, but never mind that), but he said it a lot better.
Do people anywhere really think Powell's a good speaker?
Another thing that just occurred to me... I watched a recording of Colin Powell's statement to the UN Security Council last Wednesday, and saw Jack Straw speaking just after him. I've seen people saying - seen peripherally, that is - that Powell's speech was "powerful" and "moving". Um, folks. The man read it from a sheet of paper in front of him, pausing every three words and looking up. It was like a poor performance in a small debating society. Jack Straw didn't say anything substantially different (in fact, it reminded me of the puppet scene from Chicago, but never mind that), but he said it a lot better.
Do people anywhere really think Powell's a good speaker?
From:
no subject
I get the impression he is usually praised for being decent, principled, intelligent, all those things, rather than rhetorically brilliant.
(His generally principled angle on things seemed to be shown yet again in the Iraq crisis in how he, at first, seemed reluctant to be quite as into Manichean Dualism as Bush. What he is doing now spouting Bush's party line absolutely bewilders me.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(Trivial tangent: Churchill was even brutal towards the goldfish in his ornamental pond! he would only feed them so much and the quick goldfish got all the food, the rest didn't get any -- when an interviewer was aghast by his goldfish treatment, Churchill cheerfully replied it was all about survival of the fittest.)
I can't imagine Churchill would have been toting "No to War" placards next Saturday.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Come to think of it, after September 11th, one of the Churchill web sites tried to get Churchill to speak FOR America -- they reclaimed his speeches for the War on Terrorism . They edited the specifics of date and place, and posted it on their page as a manifesto for what America would do in response to the Towers tragedy.
:/
From:
ooh
I wish I'd seen it...
From:
Re: ooh
Blair apparently replied "I take it you're not in favour then...."
From:
no subject
From:
no subject