![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I'm spending a lot of time here on small fixes on the site. It's nothing short of amazing how much time they take. I'm also trying to catch up on my web-development lists, and I'm seeing that people using tables in their sites are being told more and more to use CSS instead. Now, while I'm all in favour of CSS, and the separation of content and presentation, it seems that it's not quite time to switch to pure CSS layout. What do y'all out there do with your sites - pure CSS, and leave the old browsers out in the cold, or table layouts, and include everyone at the expense of "proper" standards?
Speaking of web development, I have an article on Evolt now: On Time, Every Time: Timing Material in CF. I'm pleased it's up there, and even more pleased that I've had a request from that for articles for another site.
Speaking of web development, I have an article on Evolt now: On Time, Every Time: Timing Material in CF. I'm pleased it's up there, and even more pleased that I've had a request from that for articles for another site.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
If you use CSS for your layout, the page will look like arse in NS4, but it will still work. So, people can still use your site, but they will get negative feedback for using Netscape Navigator 4.X, which may encourage them to use another browser. Which is as it should be.
(Christ, even IE3 has more passable CSS support than did NS4.)