I am back on my feet again after a few days of an unpleasant throat infection. While any illness makes me rather brain-dead, I did manage to force a few thoughts for Starbound through between sleeping and staring blankly at the TV. One of these gives rise to a question, part historical, part... actually, I can't even categorise it, I'll just ask it.

How global are global events?

Consider, for example, World War II. If you lived in England or Continental Europe, you could not miss it - even if you were in a serious outback area, chances are that you were affected by rationing, drafting, or troop movements. If you lived in the West of Ireland, though, you might not have experienced much change. Parts of the USA would have experienced little difference for most of the war. Sub-Saharan Africa was probably not much affected, and South America likewise. Places like the Phillipines were definitely altered, but there were probably some Pacific islands to which it made no difference. India? I have no idea.

How realistic is that assessment? Is there a theshold beyond which an event has a (possibly knock-on) effect on everyone? How would you measure it?

And yes, I know there are going to be differences for an interstellar setting. I want to figure out how things work here first.

From: [identity profile] salith.livejournal.com


There would most likely be daily news coverage in those parts not affected, but news agencies would probably jump on the band wagon of getting as many viewers as possible for their news feeds.

From: [identity profile] wechsler.livejournal.com


This presumes a global news/information network, which wouldn't have existed in the 1940s.

Its existence in a hypothetical future universe depends on the existence of FTL or instantaneous communication.
.
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags